Health Coverage Enrollment
The major features of the ACA took effect in 2014. The law mandates that everyone have health insurance, forbids insurance companies from charging more or denying coverage to people with pre-existing health conditions, and offers income-based subsidies to purchase coverage on an insurance exchange. It also offers states funding to expand their Medicaid membership.
Children fared especially well. The under-18 uninsured rate plunged to 2.5 percent from seven percent in 2013.
Medicaid expansion accounts for most of Colorado’s coverage gains. About 400,000 Coloradans signed up for Medicaid after becoming eligible through the ACA, bringing the state’s Medicaid membership to 1.3 million. Meanwhile, Colorado experienced a small drop in people who were insured through an employer, part of a continuing national trend of diminishing job-based coverage.
Table 1. Medicaid Eligibility Before and After the ACA
|0 – 147% of FPL
|0 – 147% of FPL
|Adults without dependent children
|0 – 138% of FPL
|0 – 60% of FPL
|0 – 138% of FPL
|0 -200% of FPL
|0 -200% of FPL
Groups with the Largest Improvements
By age: The largest coverage gains coinciding with the ACA were made by young people and those with lower incomes. Recipients of the ACA’s coverage benefits tend to live in Denver and rural southern and western Colorado.
All age groups saw declines in their uninsured rates since the pre-ACA days, but those under 30 had the largest drops. Even so, adults under 30 — the “young invincibles” — remain the largest group of uninsured Coloradans, and adults in their 30s also have lower insured rates than kids or older adults.
By income: Low- to middle-income Coloradans have seen the greatest coverage gains in the ACA era. (See Figure 3.) People between 100 percent and 300 percent of the poverty level ($24,600 to $73,800 for a family of four) had the largest gains in insurance. Some 10 percent of Coloradans below the poverty level remained uninsured in 2015, even though this group should be eligible for Medicaid. However, it’s likely that this group includes a sizeable part of Colorado’s undocumented population, which is ineligible for Medicaid. The Colorado Health Institute estimates that 112,000 undocumented immigrants in Colorado lack coverage.
By geography: Every Colorado county experienced an increase in Medicaid enrollment through the ACA. While cities — especially the Denver area — account for the largest share of the Medicaid expansion, rural counties in southern Colorado have a larger percentage of their small populations covered by the ACA’s Medicaid expansion. The county with the highest portion of its population in the Medicaid expansion is Costilla, at 19 percent.
Meanwhile, Western Slope counties had the highest proportions of residents who received ACA subsidies to buy private insurance. Colorado’s state insurance marketplace, Connect for Health Colorado, has seen steadily growing enrollment since it opened in 2014. Shopping on the marketplace is the only way that income-qualified Coloradans can receive federal subsidies for insurance coverage. About 104,000 Coloradans received federal subsidies to help pay for insurance policies they bought on Connect for Health Colorado in 2016. The mountain counties of San Miguel and Gunnison topped the list for the largest part of the population receiving subsidies through Connect for Health Colorado, at about 10 percent each.
Other ACA effects on insurance
The ACA had wide-ranging effects on health coverage beyond Medicaid and the individual market.
Its provisions include:
- A guarantee that insurance companies must offer coverage to anyone who asks, without charging more or turning away people with pre-existing health conditions.
- The abolishing of lifetime spending limits for insurance coverage.
- A set of essential health benefits that every insurance policy must cover.
- Mandates for larger employers to offer insurance coverage or pay a penalty.
- Mandates for individual people to obtain coverage or pay a tax penalty.
Health Coverage Spending
Colorado’s Medicaid expansion was larger and costlier than ACA advocates predicted when the act passed. Expansion costs totaled $1.6 billion in the first two years, even though the legislature’s fiscal experts projected just $1.2 billion in spending.
Almost all the costs so far have been borne by the federal government, which paid 100 percent of the tab for the expansion population through 2016, with the share set to reduce to 90 percent by 2020.
CHI estimates Colorado will be spending $222 million annually for Medicaid expansion by 2020 — covering both its 10 percent share for the expansion group and half the costs for those who were eligible before the ACA but had not signed up. Under current state law, all of Colorado’s costs for the expansion population will be paid from the Hospital Provider Fee, not the state general fund.
Colorado would be in a bind if Congress removed the enhanced federal match and returned to the traditional 50/50 split on Medicaid between the federal government and the states. The move would impose an additional $780 million cost on the state in the next fiscal year — roughly the legislature’s entire general fund budget for higher education. It is unlikely that Colorado would be able to keep covering its expanded Medicaid population if Congress removed the enhanced federal match.
- 94%-6%: Current federal-state funding to cover Medicaid expansion under the ACA
- $780 million: Cost to the state this year if Congress would return the split to 50%-50%
Consumer Insurance Costs
The ACA did not stop the trend of rising costs for health care and health insurance. But it’s hard to make an evidence-based case that the ACA increased prices. What is clear is that the ACA made it possible to track health insurance prices on the individual market.
Prior to the law, there was no way to compare prices of similar insurance products. The ACA’s online marketplaces and metal tiers — which categorize plans by their quality, from bronze up to platinum — give consumers an easy way to shop based on price. These features also make it possible to track trends in prices and the number of plans offered.
Insurance companies that do business in Colorado greeted the ACA with a wave of enthusiasm and price-cutting. However, many carriers suffered losses on the individual market, and the number of plans has dropped while the average price has risen. Rural Colorado, especially the Western Slope, suffers from a lack of insurance carriers and high premium prices — likely a result of the higher costs charged by medical providers in those regions.
The ACA is responsible for a large expansion of health coverage in Colorado.
Medicaid expansion gets most of the credit for the drop in the uninsured rate, although subsidies offered through the health insurance marketplace played a part as well.
Costs to the state of Colorado so far have been minimal, but they are projected to increase as the federal share for covering the Medicaid expansion population shrinks from now until 2020.
The ACA created a way for consumers and researchers to compare insurance prices on the individual market. Consumers saw discounted prices the first few years of the ACA followed by steep price increases. The ACA did not cause these increases, but it also has not curbed the trend of rising costs for health care and health coverage.
This mixed legacy — increased coverage but also a failure to rein in costs — forms the backdrop of the debate over the law’s fate, and any potential replacement plans will have to take this legacy into account.
It’s not possible to compare individual market prices before and after the ACA because of the lack of comparable data before 2014. However, national statistics show that growth in insurance premiums slowed slightly after the ACA was passed, even though they continue to rise.