Colorado Health Access Survey Data Indicate Many Families Struggle to Access Child Care
Even during the COVID-19 pandemic when many child care centers were closed, affordability was the top barrier to child care access for socially and economically disadvantaged families.
Parents/guardians with unmet child care needs were twice as likely to report poor general health and mental health as those who had adequate access to child care.
Colorado policymakers are considering ways to increase child care availability, but additional funding and legislation are needed to improve the system for both providers and families.
November 30, 2022
May 11, 2023
Nearly one in 10 (9%) parents/guardians with a child 17 or younger reported that there was at least a week in the past 12 months when they needed but could not get child care, according to the 2021 Colorado Health Access Survey (CHAS).(1) This represents over 200,000 parents/guardians statewide. Nearly 12% of families with children 5 or younger reported unmet child care needs.
Cost was the most commonly reported barrier to accessing child care. Nearly one-third (30.9%) of Coloradans who couldn’t access child care for a week or more said it was because they couldn’t afford it. Infant care in Colorado ($15,325 per year on average) is one of the biggest expenses families face, costing more than average annual rent ($13,829) or in-state tuition for a four-year public college ($9,540).(2)
While recent legislation to expand access is promising, additional policy and programmatic solutions are needed to support Colorado’s families and address child care gaps.
Who in Colorado Struggles to Access Child Care?
The struggle to find child care disproportionately affected some Coloradans. Unmet child care needs in Colorado varied by geography, race/ethnicity, and income.
According to the 2021 CHAS, parents/guardians in Pueblo County and rural southwest Colorado had the hardest time finding child care. Nearly one in five (17.8%) families in Pueblo County reported not being able to access child care when they needed it, compared to the state average of 9.0%.
This is in line with findings from the 2019 Colorado Shines Brighter Needs Assessment conducted by CHI, which found that Pueblo County met parental preference for child care absent of barriers (such as cost, availability, quality, and accessibility) at the lowest rate compared to other urban counties.(3) For infant care, the capacity of licensed providers in Pueblo met only 18% of the ideal or desired state, compared to between 29-35% for counties in the Denver metropolitan area.
In southwest Colorado, 17.0% of parents/guardians reported not being able to access child care when they needed it. This rate is over five times that for parents/guardians in other parts of the state, such as Douglas County (3.0%), according to the CHAS. Parents/guardians in rural southwest Colorado also face a disproportionately high cost burden for child care. In Montezuma and Mineral counties, 36% of the median household income is required to pay for child care expenses, compared to 20% in Douglas County (see Map 2).(4)
According to the 2021 CHAS, nearly one in five (18.7%) Black or African American parents/guardians reported they could not access child care when they needed it, compared to 10.2% of Hispanic/Latino and 7.1% of white parents/guardians (see Figure 1). The reasons why varied by respondents’ ethnicity, which is discussed in greater detail later in this brief.
While much of the focus during the COVID-19 pandemic was on whether child care facilities could safely operate, the issue of affordability never went away. In fact, it was exacerbated during the pandemic when half of all Colorado families and nearly three-quarters (71.3%) of families earning less than $25,000 per year reported income loss.(5) CHAS data reveal significant differences in child care access by income. About 17% of parents/guardians living at or below 100% of the federal poverty level ($27,750 per year for a family of four in 2022) needed but couldn’t find child care in the past year, nearly triple the 6.1% of those living at more than four times the federal poverty level. Without the Colorado Child Care Assistance Program, which aims to close the gap in access for low-income earning families, these disparities would likely be even greater.
Why Does Access to Affordable Child Care Matter?
Child care access is a social determinant of health that is closely tied to health and well-being. It also contributes to disparities in wage-earning potential.
Health Care Access
CHAS data reveal that not having child care directly impacts a parent/guardian’s ability to get health care. About one in 20 Coloradans (5.6%) with a child under 14 was unable to schedule a health care appointment in the past year because they could not find child care. This accounts for over 100,000 people statewide. From 2015 to 2019, an increasing number of parents/guardians reported not being able to schedule an appointment due to unmet child care needs (from 7.8% to 11.7%); in 2021 this dropped to 5.6%, likely due to an overall decrease in in-person appointments and the rise of telemedicine during the pandemic, which made it easier to see a provider even without child care.
However, female, Hispanic/Latino, and low-income earning parents/guardians were more likely to report they were unable to schedule an appointment due to unmet child care needs in the past year (8.2%, 8.5%, and 12.2% respectively) compared to male, white, and high-income earning parents/guardians (2.9%, 3.1%, and 2.8% respectively). In other words, female and Hispanic/Latino parents were nearly three times as likely to report not scheduling an appointment due to unmet child care needs as men and white parents.
Parents/guardians with incomes at or below 100% of the federal poverty level were more than four times as likely to report this challenge as parents/guardians with incomes over 400% of the federal poverty level.
Child care access issues exacerbate existing disparities in health, creating additional barriers to care for socially and economically disadvantaged families.
Physical and Mental Health Status
Parents/guardians who said they struggled to access child care were also more likely to report worse overall health and mental health. Of those reporting they could not access child care when they needed it, nearly 40% also reported experiencing poor mental health (defined as eight or more days of poor mental health in the past month). By comparison, 17.3% of those who report having no difficulty accessing child care experienced poor mental health (see Figure 3).
The same is true of general health. Of those reporting they could not access child care when they needed it, 12.3% reported having poor general health — nearly double the rate of poor health for those who reported no difficulty accessing child care (6.5%).
This correlation suggests that the same underlying social and economic factors that contribute to difficulties accessing child care also affect an individual’s ability to thrive. Families that struggle to access child care would benefit from not only more affordable child care but also from social services that promote physical and mental wellness.
In addition to the impacts of child care access on health, having child care goes hand-in-hand with parent/ guardian well-being overall. Parents/guardians who reported unmet child care needs were more likely to report experiencing housing instability, food insecurity, and problems paying medical bills. About one in seven (14.4%) parents/guardians who reported unmet child care needs also reported experiencing housing instability, compared to about one in 30 (3.2%) of those without unmet child care needs. Food insecurity was 3.5 times more common among parent/guardians who struggled to access child care (18.3%) compared to those who did not (5.0%), and nearly 30% of parents/guardians with unmet child care needs also struggled to pay medical bills, compared to 10% of those who did not have trouble accessing child care.
A national survey of parents with kids under 5 from ParentsTogether Action reveals that 42% of parents had to make a financial trade-off to pay for child care during the pandemic. Families had to cut back on things like food expenses, utility bills, rent or mortgage payments, activities for their kids, savings, and leisure activities.(6)
In short, when families struggle to afford child care, they can miss out on parts of life that help them thrive, such as healthy food, safe and stable housing, fun activities, family trips, and saving for the future.
The unaffordable cost of child care means that many families with young children must decide if they are going to spend a significant amount of their income on child care, find less expensive but potentially lower-quality child care, or leave the workforce to care for their children. The high cost burden drives more women than men from the workforce.
In a 2018 survey conducted by the Center for American Progress, mothers were 40% more likely than fathers to report that they had personally felt the negative impact of child care issues on their careers.(7) The pandemic exacerbated this disparity. Of those who lost their job during the pandemic, 26% of women reported it was due to a lack of child care compared to 13% of men.(8) Missing work due to a lack of child care was more common for women of color, women without a college degree, and women living in low-income earning households.
Why do Coloradans Struggle to Access Child Care?
Lack of affordability and availability have been persistent and long-standing barriers to child care access.
Affordability of Child Care
The COVID-19 pandemic worsened child care access, which was already out of reach for many due to its cost. The 2021 CHAS found that families cited either cost (30.9%) or a facility closure due to COVID-19 (29.1%) as the main reason for unmet child care needs. Other reasons include an inability to find a provider with space for additional children, problems with the location, or concerns over the quality of care.
The top reason for unmet child care needs differed by respondents’ ethnicity and income. Over half (52.4%) of Hispanic/Latino parents with unmet child care needs cited cost as the top reason, compared to 19.8% of non-Hispanic white Coloradans (see Figure 4). Parents/guardians with incomes at or below 200% of the federal poverty level were more than twice as likely to report affordability as the main reason for unmet child care needs, compared with parents/guardians above 200% of the federal poverty level (see Figure 5). By contrast, non-Hispanic white and high-income earning parents/guardians reported COVID-19-related facility closures as the main reason for unmet child care needs.
Families of color and low-income earning families often use family members, friends, or neighbors as child care providers instead of formal child care facilities. Family, friend, or neighbor care is flexible, allows parents to choose caregivers based on cultural or linguistic traits, and is a more accessible child care option when waitlists at daycare centers are long and the cost is unaffordable.(9) This reliance on family, friends, or neighbors could explain why fewer Hispanic/ Latino and low-income earning parents/guardians reported unmet child care needs due to facility closures during the pandemic compared to non-Hispanic white and higher-income earning parents/guardians.
Child Care Center and Provider Availability
Provider and facility shortages further contribute to the inaccessibility of child care. According to the Bell Policy Center, Colorado is short 94,000 slots at licensed child care facilities if it hopes to offer care for the 246,000 children under age 6 with working parents.(13) During the early part of the pandemic, 10% of Colorado child care providers shut down, and enrollment dropped by half.(14) Given the limited supply of licensed spots, waitlists can be two to three years long, leading some Coloradans to sign up before they even become pregnant.(15)
There is a shortage of qualified early childhood educators in Colorado, largely due to challenges for these providers to earn a livable income. On average, early childhood educators make just above minimum wage. During the pandemic, a quarter of the workforce was furloughed or laid off as child care facilities suffered from closures and other disruptions. Of those workers who came back, less than half say they are sure they will stay in their position for the next two years.(14)
Taken together, the high costs and demand for child care and the poor compensation for early childhood educators seem paradoxical. However, despite high demand and low supply, providers operate on such thin profit margins that the financial outlook for operating a child care center is daunting. This is largely because of costs associated with meeting infant program requirements and expenses to comply with low staff-to-child ratios.(3)
What Is Being Done to Address Child Care Challenges?
While the child care system poses challenges, progress is underway and driven by several factors. Early childhood programs, most notably universal preschool, have been a key priority for Gov. Jared Polis during his first term in office. State legislators have been talking about the importance of paid family leave both within and outside of the legislature. The state invested $271 million of federal stimulus funds to improve access to and affordability of child care by supporting child care programs and providers statewide. This support includes grants for licensed child care programs, bonuses for newly licensed providers, and free early childhood education coursework.(16)
Read the brief to learn more about other policies, programs, and resources dedicated to improving the child care system in Colorado.
Child Care Is Unaffordable Across the Nation, Including in Colorado
Child care is unaffordable for many families across the United States, and the country trails many of its peers in making care accessible.
The 38 nations of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development spend an average of $14,000 of government funds per child per year for early childhood care. The United States, by comparison, spends $500.(10) This is largely due to ideological differences; in the United States, child care is more often seen as a family matter to be funded privately rather than as a public good.(11) This means the cost of child care in the U.S. is left largely to families rather than federal or state governments, making child care access inequitable and largely dependent on income.
The cost and affordability of child care differs across the nation, with Colorado ranking 8th out of 50 states and the District of Columbia for most expensive infant care. According to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, child care is considered affordable if it costs no more than 7% of a family’s income. By this metric, only 6.2% of Colorado families can consider their infant care to be affordable. The average annual cost of infant care in Colorado is $15,325, or more than $1,200 per month. This accounts for 21% of Colorado families’ median income and more than three-fifths (61.4%) of a minimum-wage earning parent/guardian’s income.(2) Colorado families with two working adults and two children spend more on child care than they do on housing, transportation, food, or medical expenses.(12) (See Figure 6.)
The 2021 CHAS found that nearly one in nine (11.8%) parents/guardians in Colorado with a child 5 or younger struggled to access child care, a challenge that has been exacerbated by the pandemic and rising costs. The average Colorado family spends more on child care than on necessities such as food, transportation, and housing. Access to child care is inequitable, with more low-income earning families and families of color going without child care when they need it. Unaffordable child care harms the health and well-being of parents/guardians and disproportionately affects low-income earning women and women of color, leading to greater inequities.
Improving the system will require substantial investments and policy change from both the private and public sectors, but the cost of doing nothing would be a detriment to not only parents/guardians and their children, but communities across the state.
Emily Santich, lead author. Rachel Bowyer, Alex Caldwell, Allie Morgan, Kendra Neumann, and Lindsey Whittington contributed to this report.